Tuesday, October 2, 2012

The Trap of Consumerism


                            Consumerism is a devastating obstacle to faith.  It adversely affects the possibility of connecting non-believers to Christ, and it negatively affects a Christian’s potential to deepen his/her relationship with the Savior.  A Consumerism mindset is a sinful concoction of greed, selfishness, lack of faith, and idolatry.  When we are locked in this “Trap of Consumerism”, we commit the sin of greed and selfishness in gathering physical goods for the purpose of bringing pleasure to ourselves alone.  Our sin of lack of faith is evident by our doubts that God is able or loving enough to provide for our needs; therefore, we commit the sin of idolatry by attempting to add value and worth to ourselves through the things we acquire.
Definition of “The Trap of Consumerism”
                A consumer minded person acquires physical goods for the purpose of bringing value and fulfillment to his life.  This mind set is a trap.  In order to avoid getting caught in a trap one needs to be aware that the trap is in front of him.  “The Trap of Consumerism” is no different; there are three pieces of the trap of which one needs to be aware.  The epidemic history of Consumerism has been an issue since humans began to occupy the Earth, and there are examples of it throughout the Bible and secular history; it is only more visible because of the fast paced advancement of modern technology.  The second part of the trap, which can catch one in the mindset of consumerism, is misuse of the desires that God embedded in each person.  These God-given desires cause a longing for a relationship with Him, but in sin one attempts to replace God with material goods.  The third part of “The Trap of Consumerism” is the public and aggressive advertisement campaign, which attempts to tout the benefits of being a consumerist and ignores or lies about the side effects.  When a person is caught in the trap it warps every aspect of his life.  It affects marriage, children, occupations, and ones relationship to the church and Jesus.  In order to have an effective apologetic conversation with a person who has been trapped in consumerism, one must reveal the lies of consumerism and attempt to convince the person to realign his life with Christ as the catalyst for his value, esteem, and self worth.
History of the “Trap of Consumerism”
                The reality of consumerism is that it has plagued Earth since the creation of the world; in order to avoid “The Trap of Consumerism” we must be aware of its epidemic history. Throughout the Bible are examples of people connecting to physical items and depriving God of the honor due to Him.  A typical theme of the Bible is when people honor God with the proper place in their lives they are blessed; when they commit sins of greed, selfishness, lack of faith, and idolatry, they are punished.
In the Biblical account of Adam and Eve the couple is tempted by Satan to desire an ability that God has chosen not to give them (Genesis 3).  They do not trust that God has taken care of all of their needs, and believe that they must take matters into their own hands in order to have the wisdom they lack and be more complete.  When they take the fruit and eat of it, their desire is for the piece of fruit to give them value, which is the honor that only God deserves. Throughout the Bible are many examples of people committing the sin of consumerism.  While in the wilderness, God fed His people with manna, but the Jews put more faith in the manna than God who provided it (Exodus 16:20).    In the story of the “rich young ruler”, the man makes a conscious decision not to follow Christ because he was unable to break his connection to wealth (Mark 10).  When God was passing the throne from King Saul to David, Saul clung to his power and status, and attempted many times to murder David rather than trust that God had his interest in mind as well (1 Samuel).  Whether it is fruit, manna, birthrights, or family members, the Bible is full of people who place physical goods above God.  This theme of blessing and cursing is parallel in the secular world as well.  Men who chase physical products over God tend to never be satisfied, but those who honor God and find their value in knowing Him are blessed. 
Multi-billionaire J.D. Rockafeller was asked in an interview, “How much money is enough?”.  Rockefeller answered, “One more dollar”.  Men throughout history have had the misguided attitude that accumulating stuff was more important that serving God. The terrible atrocities of genocide, slavery, murder, and theft were often done to add money, land, or power to the person or persons in charge.  Marcus Licinius Crassus, a Roman general during the reign of Julius Caesar, would suspiciously show up with his men to the scene of a burning home and purchase the home on the spot for nearly nothing.  Once the deal, was done his men would put out the fire (which they most likely started).  Crassus made his fortune by remodeling and renting the homes he acquired.  Genghis Khan, William H. Vanderbilt, Charles Ponzi, and Imelda Marcos are just a few of the historical characters who ignored God to pursue their own greed. None of them were ever content.
                The mindset of placing material goods above God is the same in modern history, but the temptation to fall into “The Trap of Consumerism” is magnified by the tremendous achievements in technology.  Modern technology and the rapid speed at which it is advancing has altered the sin of consumerism.  Although the sins of greed, selfishness, lack of faith, and idolatry are the same, the mass-production of cars, television sets, telephones, and computers has given us more opportunity and temptation to commit the sin.  Apple computers is one of the biggest modern technology companies.  Apple marketed its first computer, the Apple I, in 1976.  It produced newer models to the computer in 1977 and 1980, but it was the Macintosh, which was introduced in 1984, which “changed everything”.  Apple has invented, marketed, and sold an upgraded model to its computer every year, and usually Apple puts out four or more different models.  Apple has done a great job creating fans out of its customers.  Many people have allowed their desire for Apple products to become an obsession.  They want every product; impulsively spend money on the newest model, and covet products of others, which they can’t afford.  When a product is new they love it, but when a new Apple product comes out, they immediately feel that their product is substandard.  The idea that someone might have a better product than they drives them to purchase new products. Apple, the company, is not the problem; “The Trap of Consumerism” is.  Companies like Apple can be the vehicle by which people are more easily stuck in the trap.  People commit sins of greed and selfishness in their desires for a certain product; they can show a lack of faith in God by believing that purchasing a new item with bring them happiness.  They commit the sin of idolatry when they begin to find value in themselves because of the things they own. 
The Consumerism Trap-Natural Inclination
                The second component of “The Trap of Consumerism” is misuse of the natural inclinations God implanted in us when we were created.  French philosopher Blaise Pascal wrote,  “ There is a God-shaped vacuum in the heart of every man which cannot be filled by any created thing, but only by God, the Creator, made known through Jesus.”  Our longing to be complete is a longing given to us by God.  He created us with this emptiness, and it is His desire that this emptiness drives us to a relationship with Him.  We become complete when we do so.  In Acts 17, Paul the apostle is traveling through Athens, and he sees an altar “to an unknown god”.  He confronts a group of men in Athens telling them that the god in whom they do not know but with whom they long for a connection is the God of the Bible.  Paul knows they are chasing their natural inclinations, but in their misguided sin they are failing to connect to the One True God.  G.K. Chesterson, a well known philosopher and Christian apologist, was quoted as saying, “When people cease to believe in God, they do not believe in nothing; they believe in anything!"  The vacuum we have in our lives causes us to long for happiness and lives of importance, but we will have neither until we allow God to occupy the rightful spot in our lives.  Attempting to give God’s rightful place to anything but Him tightens the reigns of  “The Trap of Consumerism” on us. 
                God is the only source of true joy, and He is only one we should choose to fill the vacuum of joy in our lives.  When you become a new believer there is an exuberant feeling to God, which does fade; but the joy God can bring is eternal.  When we lack faith and commit the sin of not trusting God, we will begin to look outside of God for happiness.  The sad cycle is that the more we run to things other than God, the more our long-term happiness runs out, which runs us to more things other than God.  We can convince ourselves that the physical item we choose can bring us happiness, and there is some truth to that.  There is an allure to a shiny new purchase, but eventually the excitement of the physical item becomes dull.  I remember when I was purchasing a new car.  The weeks before I bought the car I stared at pictures of it online.  When I finally brought it home I drove around in it for a few hours while commenting on how smoothly it drove, how good it smelled, how much I liked the color, and how I liked the side view mirrors.  The car truly made me happy.  A few weeks later the car no longer made me happy.  It simply became a tool I used to navigate through life.  A physical item, no matter how alluring it may be, can never replace God.  God is the sole benefactor of long-term happiness.
                Man was created with the natural inclination to want his soul to be touched by God. The Creator of the universe desiring companionship with us is where we find value in ourselves.  We are prideful. We attempt to replace God by finding our value outside of God.  We convince ourselves that the longing in our souls can be satisfied with the material things we have acquired.  We can convince ourselves that the essence of who we are is connected to the brand of vehicle, computer operating system, or shoes we wear.  When we do this we lie to ourselves, commit the sin of idol worship, and are caught in “The Trap of Consumerism”. 
The Consumerism Trap-Commercial Persuasion
                Commercial persuasion is the third part of “The Trap of Consumerism”.  Modern companies use deception and tricks to get people to buy their products.  The lies are not only unique to a singular product, but they attempt to feed a larger widespread cultural mentality that we all need to buy more.  I have identified three of these lies, which accentuate “The Trap of Consumerism”. 
                The first lie is that, “Greed is good”.   Modern advertisements’ trends attempt to convince us that being connected to consumerism is beneficial to us.  In 2010 there was a commercial for the new Toyota Highlander.  The narrator of the commercial was a young boy who was embarrassed by his family’s “geeky-ness”.  The boy is walking past his nerd father who is washing an old ugly minivan in front of their run-down home, and he heads into the neighbor’s yard where there is a very attractive mother, a beautiful home, a brand new Toyota Highlander, and happy children.  The point of this commercial and many like it is that if you have lots of physical stuff you will be happy; but if not, you are a pathetic loser. 
                The second “Trap of Consumerism” lie is that you need all of the stuff you are being sold.  Some advertisers are direct with this.  “Parlor and Juke”, a hair product company, has a flyer currently advertising “the four products you need this summer”.  A business in my hometown is pushing “the gadget you can’t live without”.   Some companies push the idea that you need the stuff they are selling, but they are slightly less direct.  These companies use ads which show really happy people using their product, and by comparison sad people who do not have their product.  In 1979 the company 7up was selling its soda with the slogan “Cheer up”; they used commercials which showed sad people who cheered up once they took a sip.  Allied Carpets, Dish Network, and Geico have all used slogans, which implied you would be a happier person with their products. 
                The phrase “you deserve” is used in many commercials today; the idea that we deserve certain luxuries is the third lie perpetuated by ““The Trap of Consumerism”.  McDonalds tells us, “You deserve a break today”.  Doritos says, “You deserve to be happy”.  Numerous lawyers let us know we should get the “money”, “justice”, “career”, and “compensation” we deserve.  Men’s Health magazine can give us tips on getting the sex we deserve.  Carnival cruise lines informs us that, “You deserve a vacation”.  Even “your dog deserves Alpo”.  The lies we are being sold are that we are all good people, and we all deserve the best of everything.  The logical conclusion is that if we do not have the best, then we are being wronged and taken advantage of.  This kind of false thinking amplifies our selfishness and affects all the other aspects of our life.
Negative affects of Consumerism: Personal
          A devastating negative effect of “The Trap of Consumerism” is strife in man’s relationships, specifically between man and family, man and work, and man and God.  The narcissism caused by “The Trap of Consumerism” encourages people to believe that he/she deserves everything his/her heart desires.  The adversity people face when they must work out their faith, fight for their marriages, and tackle aspects of their job seems unfair.  A person caught in “The Trap of Consumerism” (ie: a narcissistic person) can love the newness of marriage, work, and faith; however, when adversity enters the picture, he can see it as time to abandon the adversity and try something new.  We believe we deserve the best, so when we are not happy we get the attitude that we should upgrade to something better.  The evidence of this is found in the rising trend of church shopping, numerous job changes, and higher divorce rates.
Negative affects of Consumerism: The Church
                The church does not typically help with the issue of the consumerism mindset because the church has been and is continuing to be caught in the trap itself.  The church’s mission should be driven by the message of the Gospel; often it is driven by fear.  Some churches fear that changing the way things are done and beginning to adopt modern technology would disconnect them from the historical traditions of the church; thus they avoid changes in technology altogether.  Other churches use every piece of modern technology they can find for fear that people will not connect to the Gospel if the production is not perfect. 
                The printing press was used to make copies of the Bible as early as 1440; in 1517 when Martin Luther used it to publish claims against the sins of the corporate church, the church fought to stop him.  There was also tremendous fear over the printing press being used to copy the Bible in the language of the people.  Many of the issues involving the printing press were wrapped up in the Pope and his fight to keep control over the people.  In modern times we have copious amount of technological tools that can be used to share the Gospel.  Some churches fear the use of this technology, and limit the possibilities of communicating the Gospel.  Social media websites such as Facebook, twitter, and Blogspot are tools, which can be used to spread the Gospel; however, many churches avoid or even preach against these websites.  Screens and video projectors that project the lyrics of songs, Bible verses, and sermon outlines can be very useful; although they need to be designed tastefully; many churches refuse to use them out of fear of anything modern.   Many conflicts have happened in the church over the issue of music.  People have grown up on certain styles and a certain playlist since they were children.  Out of fear of the reaction of the congregation many churches will only play music they consider traditional.  They ignore the fact that the Holy Spirit is still moving and influencing music today.  In 1962, Billy and Ruth Graham saw a need for a full-time Christian influence on the radio; they established “Blue Ridge Broadcasting”.  They did not fear the modern medium of radio as many other Christians had.  Over the past fifty years God has blessed the Christian radio ministry.  A church, which keeps its technology low and its style historic, is not necessarily sinning.  It is not caught in the “Trap of Consumerism”.  Fear is the sin of not trusting God, and it models a poor relationship between God’s people and material things.  This type of consumer mindset is indirect; it is replacing God with comfort, safety, and “the way things have always been”.  A church, which connects to these things over God, is caught in “The Trap of Consumerism”.  The more direct way a church falls into the consumer mindset is when fear drives it to connect to things modern and abandon the traditional.
                 The sin of some churches is not fear of changing; in fact it’s quite the opposite.  Some churches have corporately fallen into the same “Trap of Consumerism” that individuals have; they fear that people will only stay at their church if they continue to have the best performance of all the churches in town.  This fear drives them to spend more money than necessary on projectors, screens, music, and even staff.   It is a wonderful thing to attempt to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ in unique and creative ways, but the fear that it must be packaged a certain way in order to order to be accepted shows doubt in the power of the Gospel. 
An apologetic conversation with a person caught in “The Trap of Consumerism”
            God created us with a longing in our souls for relationship.  People make the mistake of connecting to material things when this makes us feel more alone and isolated.  The Christian faith offers true, genuine community.  Chasing the consumerist mindset will bring satisfaction to our desires, but only for a short time.  This satisfaction is only temporary.  The only permanent solution to our longings is a relationship with Jesus.  Materialism tells us that we are the most important person in the world, and that we deserve everything our hearts desire.  When we realize how valueless our life is we lose hope.  We find real importance when we realize that the Creator of the universe desires to be connected to us.
                In an apologetic conversation with a person caught in “The Trap of Consumerism”, it is imperative that we are aware that people connect to material items because of a pointless attempt to have a life of value.  Chasing material things is counterproductive; it does not give our lives value; it only drives us farther from the only one who can bring value in our lives.  The Christian life is the only possible way to have a life of true value.  It is our responsibility to reveal to a person caught in “The Trap of Consumerism” that fact.
Historically Valuable People
                An apologetic conversation could begin by talking about people throughout history who made a valuable impact on the world. Beethoven, Steve Jobs, Abraham Lincoln, and other characters made enormous impact on the world.  Some people are impacted daily because of the work of historically valuable people; but no man, regardless of his importance, has been able to affect the universe.  Everyone wants his or her life to have importance.  No matter how great our life is on earth, our legacy will disappear; our impact will be minimal; we will eventually be forgotten.  True value is not accomplished because of what we own or what we’ve done.  A life can only have lasting importance if it is connected to the One who created everything. 
God loves us
                In Louie Giglio’s book, “I Am Not, but I know I Am” he gives a list of things Moses must have realized when he heard the voice of God.  I am not the center of everything.  I am not in control.  I am not the solution.  I am not all-powerful.  I am not calling the shots.  I am not the owner of everything.  I am not the Lord.  It may have been revealed to Moses the many things he was not, but his value was found in knowing the Creator.  There is nothing more amazing than the understanding that God wants community with us.  To imagine we can find value in ourselves because we connect to an ipad is ridiculous, when we have been invited into a connection with God.  No material thing will ever give us long-term satisfaction; it will always come up short, and we will always be unsatisfied. 
The Penalty of Sin and Jesus
                The concept of getting what we deserve greatly impacts a consumer minded person; there is a thought that because a person is basically a good person he/she deserves the best of everything.  It is important to boldly talk about sin and the penalty of sin because it reveals what we really deserve.  Romans 3:23 says, “for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”.  We must abandon the idea that we are good people.  In the book of Mark Jesus says, “for it is from within, out of a person’s heart, that evil thoughts come- sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance, and folly (Mark 7:21-22)”.  Not only are we not good but also we are evil, and there is punishment for our sins.  Romans 6:23a says, “for the wages of sin is death”.  We deserve nothing more than Hell.  It’s not a gentle thought, but it is important to know that God is the only one who is good.  We are not good people, and we do not deserve the best.   
                Our sin requires a punishment, and we are separated from God because of it.  God in His infinite love for us made a solution to our separation from Him.  “God so loved the world that gave his one and only Son, that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life (John 3:16)”.  God sent His son Jesus to die in our place, to satisfy the debt we could not pay.  Embracing this relationship with Jesus is the only way we will have a life of value. 
Conclusion
                If we were to take a logical look at life we would realize the majority of our time and influence should be spent on God, family, and friends. Most people live contrary to this logic.  We pursue stuff and neglect those most important to us; in the process, we lose sight of value in our lives. Man was created for the sole purpose of glorifying and having relationship with God.  Since creation man has neglected his purpose and allowed “The Trap of Consumerism” to cause a wedge between him and God.  Biblical accounts, secular history, and modern history tell the story of man seeking to substitute their need for God with created items.  Modern technology and the aggressive advertising have advanced the unhealthy relationship between man and his stuff.  Man has a yearning deep in his soul, and to be satisfied, he must break his addiction to material goods, and pursue a saving relationship with Jesus Christ.

Works Cited
" Riley Thomas Stewart - Toyota Highlander Commercial (2010) - YouTube ." YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. . N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Aug. 2012. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80pNUxIczig&feature=player_embedded

CEO, Midtown. "Urban Dictionary: Macko." Urban Dictionary, August 25: lance armstrong. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Aug. 2012. .

Denning, Peter J., and Karen A. Frenkel. "a conversation with Steve Jobs." Communications of the ACM 32.4 (1989): 436-443. Print.

Freeze, Trevor. "BGEA: Celebrating 50 Years of Light." BGEA: Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Sept. 2012. .

Lindberg, Carter. Martin Luther: justified by grace. Nashville: Graded Press, 1988. Print.

"Materialism Never Satisfies | Bible Study Planet." Bible Study Planet | Daily bible studies for adults, teens and kids.. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Aug. 2012. .

"MountainWings.com Inspirational E-Mail - ." MountainWings - Wings Over The Mountains of Life - Daily Inspirational Email. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Aug. 2012. .

"Parlour & Juke | 4 Products you can't live without this summer...." Parlour & Juke. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Aug. 2012. .

Ward, Allen Mason. Marcus Crassus and the late Roman Republic. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1977. Print.

Giglio, Louie. I am not but I know I Am. Sisters, Or.: Multnomah Publishers, 2005. Print.

"How Oprah Winfrey Implicitly Endorses Consumerism and Materialism | Moneyland | TIME.com." Moneyland | Financial Insights from Your Wallet to Wall Street | TIME.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Sept. 2012. .

Friday, September 7, 2012

Seminary paper (An Apologetic Reflection of Peter's Sermon-Acts 3)



An Apologetic Reflection of Peter's Sermon (Acts 3)
The Apostle Peter was a master apologist who used his boldness, passion, the knowledge of his audience, and vision to connect Jewish people to the Messiah.  Peter’s sermon in Acts 3 begins with a miracle.  Peter and John were walking into the temple around three-o-clock for a prayer service when they heard a lame man beg them for money.   Although most people had ignored this man, Peter and John looked at him intently; Peter told the man to “look at them.”  Since man thought he was about to be given some money, he looked at Peter and John.   Peter told him that he and John had no money, but there is something they could give him.  Then, Peter commanded him, “In the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene-get up and walk!”  Peter grabbed the man by the hand and pulls him up to his feet. The man jumped up, stood on his feet, and began to walk, and praise God.  Nearby, a crowd of Jewish people who were getting ready for the prayer time saw the miracle.  They were aware that this man had been crippled from birth.  The crowd was amazed and quickly surrounded the healed man.  Peter immediately saw this crowd as an evangelistic opportunity; he doesn’t miss his chance to tell the Gospel.  Peter shares the story of Jesus with the crowd; he claims Jesus to be the Christ; he challenges the crowd to repent; he hopes and prays that the nation will turn its heart back to God. 

Peter’s Sermon Process
Peter is passionate about the content of his sermons.  In all of his sermons in Acts he does not deviate from his theme.  Peter began his sermons accusing the people of murder.  He drew attention to God’s power and Jesus’ authority.  He ended each sermon with a challenge for the Jews to repent, to return to God, and to receive rewards.
First, every sermon begins with an opportunity.  God placed Peter in positions to share the gospel.  Peter jumped in without hesitation or fear.  The supernatural phenomenon of the fiery tongues resting on the apostles, which is mentioned in Acts 2, just occurred.  Peter realized that God had placed him in front of a crowd of amazed people looking for answers. God allowed him to heal a man in Acts 3; once again, he stood in front of a group of amazed people.  In Acts 4, Peter was brought in front of the court, and asked to explain his recent actions.  Because Peter refused to stop preaching in the name of Jesus, he was brought in front of the council in Acts 5.  His response was to preach in the name of Jesus.  The final sermon mentioned in Acts 10 followed a series of supernatural events; an invitation from Cornelius placed him in front of a group of people.  Every time God placed Peter in front of a group of people where he had the floor, he never missed the opportunity to share the gospel. 
Peter continually used strong language to accuse Jews of murdering Jesus.  For example, in Acts 2, Peter told them that not only were they murderers, but they were also lawless in the crucifixion process.  In Acts 3 he threw it in their faces that Pilate wanted to let Jesus go; he pointed out that they set a murderer free in order to kill the Prince of Life.  In Acts 4 he gave them credit for crucifying Christ; in Acts 5 Peter told the council that they murdered Christ on a tree.  In Acts 10 he pointed out to the people that “you witnessed the things He did”, and you still murdered Him.  Peter does not give them the option of blaming their leaders or being inactive bystanders.
Thirdly, in all of his sermons Peter gave God the credit and the glory for raising Jesus from the dead.  He emphasized that Jesus was raised because the God that they supposedly served did the raising. 
Fourthly, in his sermons Peter points to the power that belongs to Christ.  This power is why Jesus conqured death, and it is the reason for the miracles that preceded each sermon.  In Acts 2 Peter said Jesus was “exalted to the right hand of God”.  He gives Christ’s power the credit for healing the crippled man in Acts 3; in Acts 4 Peter says Jesus is “The Chief Cornerstone”.  Peter says in Acts 5 that Jesus is “exalted to God’s right hand”, and He is “Prince and Savior”.  Peter said that Jesus is ordained by God to be “Judge of the living and the dead in Acts 10.  In all five sermons Peter examined the spiritual power that Jesus has and in essence the authority that the power points to. 
Finally, in every sermon, Peter called the people to repent and told them that blessings would follow if they did.  Peter said in Acts 2 they would have “their sins remitted and they would receive the Holy Spirit”.  Their sins would be “Blotted out”, and they would have times of refreshing from the presence of God in Acts 3.  In Acts 4 they would receive salvation, and in Acts 5, “their sins would be forgiven”. They would receive a remission of sins in Acts 10.  As tough as Peter’s sermons were, he ended each one with hope.  God had not given up on His people; if they repented He still wanted to heap blessings on them.

Peter Knows His Audience
Peter used three simple assessments which helped him in sharing with the crowd in Acts 3.  He knew that the crowd was a group of practicing Jews; therefore he spent a portion of his sermon validating Jesus as the Messiah who had been mentioned throughout Jewish history. Peter knew that the crowd had been through a spiritual rollercoaster the past few months.  Their intention of coming to the Passover and Pentecost and celebrating in the typical way was shattered because of the resurrection of Jesus and the arrival of the Holy Spirit.  Peter spent some time showing that the connection between these events had tremendous value to the Jewish person. Finally, Peter was able to use the setting of the temple and the prayer service itself to guide the people to repentance.

Peter specifically showed the Jewish people that the Messiah talked about throughout history was Jesus.  It was a simple observation that since the crowd was at the temple for a time of Jewish prayer, they had to be practicing Jews.  Peter even opened up his sermon by calling his listeners “Men of Israel”(Acts 3:12).  Peter realized he must show the link between Jesus and the historical Jewish faith if he had any chance of convincing this crowd that Jesus was the Messiah.  He began his sermon by drawing attention to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Acts 3:13).  He wanted the people to know that the God these three giants of the faith served had put His approval on Jesus.  Peter argued that it was God Himself who raised Jesus from the dead.  The amazing act of healing which the people had just witnesses and that it is through the Messiah’s power by which the people have just witnessed was done through the Messiah’s power.  Later in his sermon he used a quote from Moses (Acts 3:22) which not only showed that Moses was waiting for Jesus to come, but it also reinforced Jesus’ connection to the Jewish people. Peter mentioned Samuel knowing that the Jewish people knew the scriptures well.  They would have recalled that Samuel had foretold the Messiah coming from the line of David (Samuel 7:12-13).  Peter was once again connecting Jesus to the historical faith when he used language that the Jewish audience would have recognized from Isaiah 52 and 53, a text that described the coming Messiah.  In Act 3:13 Peter said that God glorified His servant Jesus, which was the same language used in Isaiah 52:13.  In Acts 3:14, Peter refered to Jesus as “the Righteous One” which was identical to the language used in Isaiah 53:11.   Everything that Peter says directly and indirectly emphasizes that Jesus was connected to the God of history, that Jesus was the Messiah the Jewish people had been looking for, and that He was the Messiah they should trust now.

Peter was aware that the people listening to him had had their spiritual beliefs thrown into chaos because of the events of Passover and Pentecost. Whether they had traveled to Jerusalem or were natives of the city, they expected a typical Passover and Pentecost event; instead, they encountered chaos. A few months earlier Jewish people had sat down for the Pascal meal, which God had instituted (Exodus 12:14).  During this meal His people had been reminded through scripture, instruction, and food that they were God’s people.  They owed allegiance to Jehovah alone.  During the meal they had heard the story of Moses and how God had used him to deliver them from Egyptian bondage.  The main portion of the meal would be lamb, which they would use to remember they had been delivered from the plague of death by the blood of the Passover Lamb (Genesis 12:1-13).  The Paschal meal and each food item in it was drenched with symbolism that they were God’s people.  Not long after having this meal the people of Jerusalem would experience the high profile execution of Jesus; three days later he would rise from the dead.  A few weeks later the city was preparing for The Feast of Weeks, during Pentecost, in which Jews were to give an offering to God for what he had given them.  There was time set up to reflect on God’s Ten Commandments, through which God’s relationship to his people was consecrated.  That year, on the day of Pentecost, the people heard a loud and violent wind.  when a large crowd of people came to see what the loud sound was they saw the supernatural phenomenon of fire come down and rest on the apostles.  Then these people of many nations heard the apostles speak; no matter what language the people in the crowd had, everyone understood.  Peter preached to the crowd on the day of Pentecost; many decided to follow the apostles teaching.  As Peter began his sermon in Acts he was able to assume that this chaotic holy season had been the experience of every person at the temple.  Since Pentecost, the chaos had begun to slow down; however, the healing of the man in front of them had amped up the electricity in the city once again.  Peter wanted to show the Jewish people that the chaos they had experienced had value to them.  Throughout Acts 3 Peter reminded the people the sin of not believing in Jesus.  He was not careful with how harsh he was to the crowd.  He recounted the opportunities they had to do the right thing, and reminded them that in the end they murdered Jesus.  Then, he gave them the good news that if they connected to the Resurrection they could be saved.  Peter did not mention directly the Arrival of the Holy Spirit, but if they decided to follow Jesus, the Holy Spirit would arrive in their lives.  The resurrection and the arrival of the Holy Spirit forever changed Passover and Pentecost. The Jewish people needed to know that these two events were not an interruption to this Holy season.  God had set these events in place since the beginning of time; the Passover and Pentecost of history had always pointed to this moment.  The audience needed to make the correction.

In Acts 3:1 Peter and John were heading to the temple at the ninth hour, which was around 3:00pm.  This afternoon prayer time was known as the Mincha.  By tradition the Jewish people would participate in the prayer service five days a week.  The people knew this prayer service well, much of it by memory.  When Peter saw the Jewish people gather around him after the miracle, he knew the hearts of the people because he knew the Mincha prayers for which they had prepared.  There were three parts to the Mincha service: The Ashrei, the Amidah, and the Tachanun.  The Jewish people came to the temple with their heart prepared for what they were to pray.  Many of the prayers they knew by heart, and all of them they knew well.  The Jewish people drew a direct connection between participating in the prayers thoughtfully and being granted a place in Heaven.
The major part of the Ashrei, the first part of the Mincha, was the recitation of Psalms 145.  The basic themes of the Ashrei were that People were happy when they were close to God, God cared about the poor and oppressed, and that God rewarded good behavior and punished evil.   There was a pneumonic device that allowed the Jewish people to memorize this part of the prayer service, and they were well versed on it.  These people had prepared their hearts to pray and knew the teaching and the themes of the Ashrei.  The theme of being happy when they were close to God was being tested because they were seeing God move through the supernatural events that were taking place in their city, but it must have been difficult for them to align themselves with this movement of God that was changing everything about their faith.   They were seeing for God care for the poor and oppressed with the healing of the man that was lame.  The third element of the Ashrei was that God rewarded good behavior and punished bad behavior.  This must have cut them to the heart when Peter called them murderers.
The second part of the Mincha, the Amidah, is a list of 19 blessings from God.  These blessings began with the “Refuah” which was a praising God for his power to heal the sick.  This part of the prayer might have had extra significance as they watched the formerly lame man jumping and praising God.  One of the last prayers was known as the “Birkat David” which asked God to bring the Messiah to them.  This prayer must have crushed them as they were accused of killing the very blessing they were praying out loud for God to bring to them.
Before the Jewish people would prayerfully leave the service they would participate in the Tachanun prayer.  This prayer time would begin with the reciting of Psalms 78:38:  “Yet he was merciful; he forgave their iniquities and did not destroy them. Time after time he restrained his anger and did not stir up his full wrath.” This verse has a clear parallel to the preaching of Peter.  The Jewish people headed to the temple that day prepared to recite a verse that declared that even though they deserved destruction, God was merciful, and that his full wrath and anger was restrained.  The Jewish people were being accused of murdering God’s son, and Peter was proclaiming the good news that God is merciful, He will forgive them, he will not destroy them, and that once again his anger will be restrained.  During the Mincha, after the reciting of Psalms 78:38 the people would pray the viduy, which is a prayer of confession followed by a reading of God’s 13 attributes of mercy.  This again accentuated their need to confess their sin of murder and thank God that He is not withholding His mercy from them.

Peter’s Goal is For the Nation to Repent
As Peter stood before his people giving a sermon, he had a deep longing for the nation of Israel to see their sin, repent, and return to God through a connection to Jesus.  In Acts 3:19 at the end of his sermon he pleaded with the people to “repent and return.”  The outcome of repentance would be that “their sins would be wiped away”.  Peter knew that only though Jesus would the Jewish people find salvation.  Neither the resurrection of Jesus nor the supernatural arrival of the Holy Spirit had transformed the hearts of the Jewish people. The healing of this lame man gave him one more shot at urging God’s people back to God.  At the end of Acts 3:19 Peter spoke of “times of refreshing” which tapped into a major theme of the history of Jewish people that there is blessing and restoration on the kingdom when the people follow God (Acts 1:6), and there is slavery and destruction when the people turn their backs to God (Deuteronomy 18:15-18). 

Peter’s Sermon Was a Failure
Peter’s sermon did not achieve what he hoped it would.  The corporate Jewish nation did not repent and return to God through Jesus; their rebellion would continue; and there would not be restoration for God’s people. Peter’s failure was amplified when after the completion of the sermon he and John were arrested, and they were forbidden to preach in the name of Jesus again.  
Despite the fact that the sermon failed to achieve the goal of bringing the Jewish people back to God, there were some positives to come from the sermon.  First, you can’t overlook the 2000 people who became followers that day (Acts 4:4).  The lives of these people and their families were eternally altered.   As Christianity spread it could be assumed that God used some of these converts as tools to further His agenda.  Another success was how Peter and John used their arrest to share the Gospel.  Peter and John were standing in center of a room surrounded by some of the most intimidating and powerful people in town.  These powerful men began questioning Peter and John.  After an intense time of questions about their authority and the court forbidding them to preach in Jesus’ name Peter was given a moment to speak.  Peter gave a repeat performance of the same sermon he had given the day before, and doesn’t hesitate to call them murderers.  God gave Peter and John the audience to share the Gospel with the powerful men of the court, and that was a success that came out of the sermon.  The final success of the sermon was that God had the sermon placed in the New Testament.  For thousands of years God has rewarded Peter’s boldness and obedience and used the sermon to lead many to Himself.  The sermon may have been a failure in its intent, but the fruit produced from the sermon is immeasurable.

Peter’s sermon in Acts 3 is a fantastic model how of we should connect with people apologetically.  Most Christians could learn from how intently Peter looked for opportunities to share the Good News of Jesus Christ. When Peter found an opportunity, he seized it boldly and without fear or hesitation.  Most Christians passively wait for God to drop evangelistic opportunities in their laps.  Peter was conscious of the people he was talking to, and he used what he knew of them to persuade them to follow Christ.  Modern Christians would be more successful in leading others to Christ if we cared about the person, to whom we were talking.  If we took time to learn about people’s beliefs and desires, then we could use that knowledge to spread the gospel.  When Peter gave a sermon he did not shy away from using bold nearly inflammatory language.  We also need to have the courage to talk honestly about the punishment of sin.  Peter had a very specific process when talking about the Gospel, and we also need to create a personal process that we use to share the Gospel.  We can also learn from Peter’s sermon when we realize that He probably didn’t think it was very successful, but God used it over thousands of years to build the kingdom and continues to use it.  When we speak to someone apologetically we need to worry less about the success of the encounter because we have no idea how God may bless our obedience.  If we were to study Peter’s sermon in Acts 3 and take on his boldness, passion for the message, knowledge of our audience, and vision we would be more successful in furthering the kingdom.  

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Ready to get jealous Zunzis fans

One of my favorite restaurants in the world is Zunzis.  Zunzis is a South African restaurant in Savannah, GA and is home to the greatest sandwich in the world, the Godfather.

While I was in Savannah last week I bought some of the awesome sauce that goes on the Godfather.  This week I did some even more awesome.

The Godfather pizza.
I started off by tossing pizza dough.  Next I cooked one side of the dough on the grill.  Then I added Zunzis sauce and Zunzis dressing, a generous amount of mozzarella cheese, grilled chicken, smoked sausage, sliced tomatos, and spinach leaves to the cooked side of the crust.  Finally the pizza hit the grill again cooked until done.

IT WAS AWESOME!!!